The Geometry of Getting Rich: Why Mathematical Intuition is the Key to Personal Finance Success

In the realm of personal finance success, few skills prove as critical yet misunderstood as mathematical intuition. It represents the ability to grasp abstract concepts—compound interest, convexity, or the impact of time—not merely as equations, but as tangible, predictable forces shaping our reality. For many, this intuition remains elusive, a casualty of a mathematical education system focused heavily on formalization.

The central challenge in personal finance is not in understanding straightforward concepts like the benefits of saving or how delayed gratification builds long-term wealth. The true obstacle lies in consistent execution. People often fail to achieve financial goals, which is a direct result of lacking mathematical intuition. Addressing this gap is a core foundation of our personal finance class.  Mathematical intuition helps make the wealth growth path feel real, immediate, and achievable.

This article describes why mathematical intuition is essential. Along the way, examples are provided from music and famous intuitive math minds. The challenge of the American math education approach is described, and why students often possess little formalized math ability. We conclude with our approach to building personal finance mathematical intuition. Our goal is to help people of all walks of life to truly see and achieve the path to getting rich, no matter how they define the amazing richness of their lives.

This article is aimed at educators working with students or clients to enhance their relationship with risk and their relationship with money.

About the author:  Jeff Hulett leads Personal Finance Reimagined (PFR), a decision-making and financial education platform dedicated to empowering individuals and businesses. PFR offers specialized services for entrepreneurs, including Founder's Copilot support and comprehensive business startup services, helping visionaries turn ideas into thriving ventures. Jeff also teaches personal finance at James Madison University and delivers impactful seminars on financial literacy. Check out his book—Making Choices, Making Money: Your Guide to Making Confident Financial Decisions.

Jeff is a career banker, data scientist, behavioral economist, and choice architect. He has held leadership roles at Wells Fargo, Citibank, KPMG, and IBM, bringing decades of experience to his mission of transforming financial decision-making.

Math as a Language of Abstraction

Many see math as separate from language. But our brain does not see it that way. To the brain, language acquisition is how it grows and improves concept clarity. Math is just one method it uses to acquire language. But math as a language serves a very important purpose, different than our day-to-day spoken language. It is the language of abstraction.

The mathematician David Bessis defines math as providing a precise language for things we cannot point to in our day-to-day lives. This makes mathematics fundamentally a language for expanding our imagination to clarify abstractions. The formalization of math becomes necessary because the objects of study remain beyond our direct, physical reach—whether non-physical concepts like probability or distant, physical entities like the gravity impacting stars in a far-off galaxy. Since we cannot physically manipulate or interact with these objects, a strict formalization becomes necessary. The notation, the symbols, and the theorems serve as the rigorous words communicating our imagination.

Developing mathematical intuition helps expand our imagination. Math is inherently visual. It helps us see beyond three dimensions, grasp the relativity of time the way Einstein did, or imagine future demand the way a visionary entrepreneur does. It helps us see music the way Bach did, structuring complex, interlocking musical forms with a mathematical structure. It helps us imagine a starry sky the way Picasso did, transforming the visible world through geometric abstraction. It turns the unseen forces of the world into clear paths and predictable outcomes.

The Intuitive Power of Seeing Music: Expanding Dimension

Think of a song from a favorite band—perhaps Led Zeppelin's Stairway to Heaven. A song serves as the listener's vessel holding a set of sounds prefabricated to align with the listener's brain processing centers. This includes the more primitive emotion centers and the fast-processing centers found in the right hemisphere of the brain's cerebral cortex. A "good" song intuitively sparks a positive emotion, and "good" is unique to the listener. For me, Stairway to Heaven instantly lifts my mood whenever it comes on. Perhaps it brings you similar happiness. If not, I invite you to think of a song creating a powerful feeling.

While music initially registers as this holistic, sensory feeling (a "fast brain," right-hemisphere focus), over time, someone with mathematical intuition will expand how they experience their favorite music. Often, it still starts in the "it just feels good" part of the brain, but as our math intuition grows, it morphs into "seeing" the music and the more language-intensive part of our brain. Then, as the seeing part of our brain sharpens, it evolves back to the intuitive part of our brain as improved intuition and imagination. It is a powerful feedback loop. This loop is the essence of how we become more intelligent, sharper thinkers.

The left hemisphere handles the technical structure—it's the analytical side responsible for notation and the step-by-step logic of language (as found in Broca's and Wernicke's areas). This is where "seeing" is developed with language for promoting imagination. Keep in mind, the brain is incredibly dynamic, but the left/right hemisphere-based logical model of the brain is useful for recognizing the essential cognition centers and their interactions as involved in imagination and seeing.

For instance, you might see Stairway to Heaven not just as a singular song, but as the rich base and drum support from John Bonham and John Paul Jones, distinct from the soaring guitar and vocals of Jimmy Page and Robert Plant.

𝄞 "And she's buying a stairway to heaven." 𝄞

This shift reflects how a developing math brain allows the whole sound to evolve into a disaggregated, multidimensional, visual structure. This vision aligns with the idea, expressed by George Dyson, the son of the Physicist Freeman Dyson: “Through music, we are able to share four-dimensional structures we are otherwise only able to observe in slices, one moment at a time.” Furthermore, Neuroscientist Dean Buonomano states: “Time is to speech and music recognition as space is to visual object recognition.”

However, as Douglas Hofstadter notes in his book Gödel, Escher, Bach, difficulty arises when simultaneously following individual components (mathematical) and hearing the whole effect (holistic). We "flip back and forth" between the two modes, enjoying the music either analytically or intuitively. I find Hoffstadter's comment to be true. I can enjoy music holistically via my right hemisphere or analytically through my left hemisphere, but I cannot do both at the same time. It is like the different parts of our brain are activated by an attention switch, so only one can be "on" in our consciousness at once. Please see the Appendix for "How I See Music." This is one person's experience with growing mathematical intuition through music.

The Flawed "Geometry Sandwich"

Given the power of seeing and imagining, plus math's role for abstraction, you may think the integration of mathematical intuition would be common in the high school math curriculum. Well, the reality is: Not so much.

Mathematics in the U.S. often receives instruction through the lens of strict formalization—the high school "geometry sandwich" of Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II, and Calculus. This approach emphasizes a timeboxed, technical scaffolding of theorems and procedures instead of nurturing imagination. Students may feel discouraged because:

1. The technical scaffolding's presentation is unaligned with the learner's readiness to internalize it. The "tyranny of the semester" requires the student to be ready when the instruction is available, instead of the instruction being available when the student is ready. One "bad" teacher can create a discouraging, difficult-to-overcome gap in the scaffold. (Please note: In my experience, students more often experience teachers as "bad" not so much because they are actually poor teachers, but because the students were not ready for their instruction.)

2. The crucial imaginative part of math—the abstract "thing" the formal structure helps us imagine—remains absent. Let's face it, almost all of life is abstract until we learn to make it more tangible.

3. Today, students are surrounded by data. Yet the geometry sandwich offers little applied math (statistics) associated with data science.

The geometry sandwich was created in the mid-20th century when calculation-intensive human "computers" were needed for many large-scale tasks, like putting a man on the moon or fighting a cold war. Today, we have computers -- really, really good computers. The underlying imagination needs of the data-intensive information age have undergone a complete transformation, whereas our math curriculum is still fighting a long-concluded war.

For many, math truly works only when tied to a progression of imaginative outcomes. For example, the formal math, like the Pythagorean theorem, helps us imagine a fundamental relationship in the real world, allowing us to see how the mathematical structure of a right triangle underlies the creation of harmonious musical scales. So if you are interested in music, there is a direct, helpful connection between Pythagoras and your interests. The emphasis should fall on the abstraction, the new truth or reality a formal concept helps us unlock. Given the purpose of math is to help us see what we otherwise cannot directly see, why teach math unless it links directly to our imagination?

Financial education as a failure of math intuition: This imagination delivery failure mirrors a core issue in financial education: Research from the Federal Financial Literacy Reform indicates that for financial knowledge to stick and influence behavior, it must be delivered in an Actionable, Relevant, and Timely (ART) manner. The traditional math curriculum, delivered years before students can apply concepts to, say, personal finance, fails on all three counts. Like financial knowledge, which decays if not used promptly, abstract math learned years in advance can fade, rendering it useless when the student actually needs it for real-world decisions.

To clarify, I am certainly not saying the formalization in the traditional geometry sandwich is inherently bad; math formalization can accelerate math intuition in a way helpful to building their professional and personal lives. The challenge relates to how that formalization is delivered today. There is a disconnect between a formalized math curriculum and the building of math intuition. Formalized math is delivered as a sequential series of time-boxed classes. Whereas math intuition emerges at different times for different students. Encouraging intuition emergence is often not part of the math curriculum. The idea is that when students build intuition along with formalization, they build mastery confidence, preparing them for the next rung in the scaffold. Removing the tyranny of the semester and adding the intuitive feedback loop will both ensure mastery and allow students to accelerate their math education. Today, the unsaid approach seems to be that it is "hoped" math students can build math intuition outside of the standard formalized math curriculum. Unfortunately, hope as a teaching strategy is failing. Please see the appendix for my "magic wand" solution for the future of math education and the incentives keeping this from happening. Up to this point, we have discussed the biological mechanisms for math intuition. We also discussed connecting math teaching to the practical abstractions math is intended to describe. We have also discussed the way math is typically taught in America and the need to evolve the math curriculum. But what does this mean for Personal Finance? The core challenge is most of my students come to class with little onboard mathematical language. So we are challenged to build mathematical intuition with little, if any, of the formalization helpful for building mathematical intuition.

Personal Finance education does not have the luxury to wait for the math curriculum to evolve. Next, we discuss how the Geometry Sandwich challenge is overcome and how Personal Finance math intuition is delivered without significant formalization.

Making Financial Success Visible: Promoting Math to Intuition

The core problem in Personal Finance—and indeed, in any discipline dealing with long-term, abstract outcomes—is the challenge of saving. Living below your means requires suppressing immediate gratification for a benefit occurring as an abstraction in the future. Students struggle to grasp the time value of money and compound interest because they cannot easily point to their benefits, even though massive benefits clearly exist. The challenge is not so much the math formalization of, say, the Future Value function; the real challenge is the context in which that math formalization is applied. Next, the cause of what makes financial outcomes so difficult is discussed.

Long-term, abstract outcomes are subject to cognitive biases. Think of a cognitive bias as the cognitive default state in which we make decisions, leading to biased outcomes. While many cognitive biases exist, two tend to have an outsized impact on financial decisions. The first is availability bias, the naturally occurring cognitive bias causing us to overweigh what we can point to today and underweight things we cannot easily point to in the future. A second cognitive bias adding to the financial success challenge is linearity bias. This cognitive bias is where people assume relationships are proportional and linear, and consequently, struggle to recognize or understand nonlinear relationships like compound interest. The linearity bias is especially significant in the personal finance context because it leads people to underpredict future outcomes based on a current effect (e.g., savings). The student's significantly flawed but default starting point is:

"Hey, all I can see is that today's savings takes away from other stuff I can do and, at the current linear rate, will never improve my life."

A fundamental goal of our class is to help students update their default decision-making process and overcome cognitive biases subverting their personal finance success. Also, time is not on our side. Meaning, even small amounts of savings invested in a student's teens or 20s have massive upside leverage compared to the same savings deployed in their 30s or 40s. Mathematical intuition helps students internalize and be motivated by the reality:

The best time to save is today.

We teach the same Personal Finance curriculum at several universities. We teach a wide variety of students, both business school students and many from outside the business school.  While there are a handful of “mathy” students, my experience suggests the majority have not developed much more than basic high school mathematical abilities. I suspect many students have gaps in their math scaffold, creating the discouragement discussed earlier. So this is tricky. Given these various math levels, our goal is to find the most effective approach for the most students. In other words, the challenge is to teach mathematical intuition to those still developing their math language. For those with stronger formalized math backgrounds, our approach seeks to enhance their Personal Finance intuition on top of their foundation. For those with less formalized math backgrounds, our approach seeks to provide Personal Finance intuition without math formalization.

In either case, our approach to teaching the Personal Finance class is to provide mathematical intuition with little formalization.  This approach is grounded in visualization and practice to help students build that mathematical intuition.  The intention is to help the personal finance students visualize the mathematical concepts necessary for personal finance success.

The mission of developing mathematical intuition becomes an act of empowerment. My job in the classroom involves elevating math in an imagination-provoking kind of way. I make it accessible and visible. We systematically work through the visible. This makes the mathematics of wealth less abstract, enabling them to grasp it intuitively.

The teaching of mathematical intuition has become easier because of apps and other technologies executing the formalized math in the background. For example, we use Definitive Choice, a decision-making and choice architecture technology. It relies on the mathematics developed by Thomas Saaty, called the Analytic Hierarchy Process ("AHP").

The AHP math is elegant, but more important is the intuition of what the math does to help the students make the best decision. At its core, AHP uses matrix algebra to organize and weigh a student's pairwise comparisons (e.g., when buying a car, "as a trade-off, how much more or less important is car color compared to car safety?"). Each time a student makes a comparison, the software updates a matrix, or a table of numbers. Our linearity bias means people are naturally good at simple, binary decisions, like that car criteria tradeoff decision mentioned earlier. We are notoriously poor at complex decisions with multiple criteria and multiple alternatives. The AHP process simplifies complex decisions into a sequence of binary choices, aligning with our cognitive biases and our natural neurobiological decision-making wetware. In other words, we defeat the cognitive bias challenge by engaging directly with it and then using a process engineered to overcome the challenge.

The formalized math occurs in the background when the software calculates the principal eigenvector of that matrix. Think of the eigenvector as a special vector (a list of numbers) representing the student's weighted importance of all the criteria. The eigenvector is the "magic" of Saatay's method. It transforms something we can see, a series of simple pairwise comparisons, into something much more difficult to see without the help of AHP: An accurate, weighted set of preferences accurately representing the expected benefit from any purchase. Then, the associated eigenvalue is like a logic check. It tells us how consistent the student was in their comparisons. Of course, people are notoriously not logical. If A is better than B and B is better than C, logic suggests A is better than C. Well, people are not always logical in this way. There may be a perfectly good reason why A is not better than C. The eigenvalue asks the question.

This process allows the app to objectively translate the student's judgmental preferences into a precise, ranked list of priorities. We help students understand the power and accuracy of their unique "what is important to me" perspective when making any purchase. Effectively, this approach helps students build their personalized utility function as defined in the microeconomics discipline. Economics is a notoriously backward-looking discipline. For example, economists often present demand curves as a historical record of individual utility functions. They assume people made "rational" utility-maximizing decisions. The AHP approach is very much the opposite. It helps people become forward-looking economists of their own lives, which includes helping individuals implement their own diverse version of rationality.

We use visual imagery to help the students make the best economic trade-offs for themselves and determine their criteria models. We use graphics to display the costs and benefits of multiple alternatives.

AHP In Action

Helping students to reveal their trade-offs

and clarify their personal utility model

By practicing a consistent, repeatable decision process with various personal finance examples and using the decision technology, we are improving mathematical intuition. We help the students imagine an otherwise abstract concept and build a mathematical intuition of living below our means and achieving the wealth-increasing benefits of compound interest.

Visualizing the Wealth Curve

I focus on showing students and clients the long-term compound interest curves as paths to wealth. We do not just calculate a future value; we chart the convex, nonlinear path. Our naturally occuring linearity bias means we are born with only an innate understanding of linear relationships. This makes internalizing the nonlinear relationship between savings and long-term wealth a difficult, non-intuitive mathematical abstraction. This challenge is compounded because the economic concept of opportunity cost—the value of the wealth they sacrifice by not saving—is also an abstraction. In almost every class and based on the many practical financial decisions they will inevitably face, the students interact with the same long-term view of their desired financial journey.

This practice encourages students to directly confront the massive opportunity costs associated with their savings-discouraging availability bias. By visualizing the path to significant wealth, the students make a crucial comparison between the small sacrifices (the necessary savings) and their big wealth potential (the convex curve outcome). This comparative view makes the abstract cost of not saving feel immediate and real, reinforcing the execution of disciplined financial behavior.

Starting on the first day of class, I share an achievable path to getting rich—based on doable savings rates, reasonable incomes, and common investments. The point is simple: this is VERY ACHIEVABLE. The biggest challenge remains building the mathematical intuition for making this abstraction intuitive.

I illustrate the dramatic difference between simple interest and the convexity of compound growth. Students see the curve remains relatively flat in the early years; the work of saving feels slow. We do not hide from that feeling; we help them understand and overcome it. As time progresses, the curve begins accelerating exponentially. This shows how the wealth elevator, seemingly stuck on the first floor for a while, was building energy like a compressed spring. At some point, the spring is released, and the elevator car accelerates to the upper floors. By making small, consistent investments today, they are stacking more cash into the elevator car that will inevitably rise and dramatically increase their future wealth. I gently introduce the theorem based on Jensen's Inequality to lay the foundation for understanding why nonlinear functions increase at an increasing rate, emphasizing the immense upside of being convex to time. Jensen's inequality is abstract, but it is reinforced by their ability to sharpen the imagination about their future wealth.

I demonstrate the mathematics of theoretical finance, such as Present Value and Future Value functions, underlying the visuals. Moving toward statistics and data science, we encounter the volatility of daily closing stock index prices to help them understand variability and dynamic risk. We "zoom out" to graphically show short-term losses nested in long-term gains.

Zooming Out

Helping students make time their friend

Improving the Relationship with Risk: Behavioral Education and Quantified Results

A central aim of our investment risk seminar, introducing the Investment Barbell Strategy (IBS), is to fundamentally change how students perceive and interact with risk, specifically focusing on helping them become comfortable with significant volatility when it is grounded by two critical factors: diversification and a long-term (decade or more) time horizon.

Measurable Shift in Risk Perspective

The educational approach centers on a personalized understanding of risk:

• Students use common risk questionnaires to measure their current volatility tolerance.

• The teaching focuses on managing the downside of volatility primarily through diversification and time. The idea is not to avoid risk, but to decide which risk to seek exposure while being protected by other risk dimensions.

• By focusing on these concepts (implicitly touching upon sophisticated risk ideas like "the Greeks" found in options pricing (Delta, Gamma, Theta, Vega, and Rho--without using the formal names), the program enables students to get comfortable with volatility and transform a source of fear into a manageable aspect of their wealth-building path.

This measured success highlights the value of behaviorally focused financial education in helping students and clients confidently weather market cycles and maintain a long-term investment strategy.

The impact of this behavioral focus is quantified by comparing student self-assessed risk tolerance before and after the IBS seminar:

• The Investment Risk Seminar Graphic illustrates a measurable improvement in the students' relationship with risk.

• The average risk score on a 10-point scale shifted by nearly half a point, indicating a movement toward greater confidence in accepting volatility.

This shift demonstrates that financial education can empower students to recognize that volatility—even from the worst financial crisis in almost 100 years—does not lead to ruin. Even more significantly, we show how crises like the 2008-2009 financial crisis led to a massive increase in wealth, but only for those who stayed in the market. It helps them imagine a future where they achieve wealth even after sustaining volatility.

I do not test them on the formulas. The point is not rote memorization, but the internalization of the shape and behavior of these financial forces. The idea is to create visualizations to encourage and empower the students' personal finance success. This is how mathematical intuition presents itself in personal finance.

The Intuitive Shift

By repeatedly showing this visual evidence and linking it to their personal decisions, something profound occurs. The concept of compound interest, understanding their opportunity costs, and improving their relationship with risk and money transforms from an abstract formula into an intuitive roadmap. They begin internalizing the reality every dollar they save today works harder, faster, and more powerfully for their future than any dollar they save ten years from now. They can "see" the future value of living below their means.

This class does not require a deep mathematical background, other than the basic, high school-level math prerequisites required by the University. This is our challenge and opportunity. That is, to find ways to expand student math intuition, in the context of Personal Finance, without having a deep math education.

My ultimate goal by the end of the course involves: 1) promoting living below their means and 2) saving as a habit, not an abstraction. This process makes getting rich via good personal finance decision-making more real and less like a fantasy. When they leave the class, they stand ready to make confident financial decisions—or, frankly, any decision requiring long-term foresight.

Being confident and setting a visible, achievable path aids in promoting abstract mathematics to their intuition. They have not just learned math; they have developed the imaginative power to fully "see" their own financial success. It offers the ultimate confirmation: the language of abstraction has become the language of their self-assured future.

After leaving my class, they now possess a higher level of math intuition than when we started. My great hope is that our personal finance starting point builds confidence for continuing to develop their math abilities for enhancing their life's success.

A message to aspiring financial educators

Our mission is to empower experienced financial practitioners who are ready to give back.  Do you have an interest in teaching at the college level?  Are you an experienced financial professional with amazing experiences and well-earned war stories to share?  Do you believe in the behavioral challenge of financial success?

Personal Finance Reimagined solves the "last-mile" problem.  We connect aspiring adjunct professors to university personal finance education.  Our textbook, technology, Canvas-ready class downloads, test banks, PowerPoint lecture presentations, and deep guest lecture network are available for aspiring financial educators.

We wrap you in the resources to supercharge your teaching success.  We walk that last mile together.

Let’s solve America’s Financial Literacy crisis together. To learn more:

PFR University Teaching

Appendix

A1. How I See Music

For me, music often registers as vectors defined by rhythm, tempo, and differential—a manifestation of mathematical beauty with a fractal quality. The perception breaks down the whole into dimensions:

• X is Time.

• Y is Music Direction.

• Pitch represents Music Speed or intervals.

• Line thickness and order represent the relative significance of the instrument type.

• Color differentiates the instrument type.

(Please note: these dimensions just "showed up" in my imagination when I was younger. I felt more like an observer than an architect. I do not know if it is technically correct, but I did not really have a choice. The dynamic imagery is just there. It is how I experience music.)

Notice this multi-dimensional system uses familiar concepts like the X-Y plane. It requires no formal mathematical notation to expand perception well beyond the standard three-dimensional world. This ability instinctively applies dimensional thinking and structure to something non-spatial—mapping concepts like pitch and color onto a geometric model. It illustrates the true power of mathematical intuition. It represents the imaginative leap allowing us to expand our seeing beyond the constraints of our standard 3D world.

Each instrument flows as a separate, colored stream in this vision. The current music appears vibrant, while the past fades. This ability mentally translates a temporal, auditory experience into a multi-dimensional, structured visual. It results directly from mathematical concepts promoted from the technical side of the left hemisphere to the intuitive side of the right hemisphere.

In this example, I am able to see (or imagine) music in about 6 dimensions.  I play no instrument, other than a pretty good air base. It is not because I am some genius mathematician. It is because I have developed a mathematical intuition by allowing my imagination to wander. The "seeing" of music only occurred after much trial and error and was motivated by my love for music.

A2. The Future of Math Education

If I had a magic wand, math teachers would become math facilitators. Their role would be to manage a portfolio of students at about the same math level. The teaching heavy lifting for students would be provided by high-quality, inexpensive digital capabilities like Khan Academy. The role of the adult math facilitator would be to encourage and cheerlead the love of learning, hold the students accountable for completing the digital coursework, and provide spot tutoring as needed. It is expected much of the spot tutoring would be provided by students with previously demonstrated subject mastery. Teaching is the ultimate form of mastery. The math facilitator would be more of a tutor overseer, connector, and manager.

The students would move as quickly or as slowly as needed, but they do not get to go to the next level on the scaffold until the current level on the scaffold is mastered.

Thanks to Sal Kahn and his pioneering work in math education.

A3. Why is math intuition not more of a curricular focus?

In the article, we observed math intuition is generally not a focus in the geometry sandwich. Why is that?

It likely relates to math curriculum weighting and incentives. The 20th century teacher training and the related curriculum expectations create incentives increasingly leading to student discouragement. The incentive reality is: Adding a bigger focus on the imaginative part of math requires de-emphasizing something else. The "something else" often impacts teachers' jobs and requires the work of education administrators to change. The American education system is notoriously resistant to change. The education system is like a hammer looking for a nail, and there are many tenured and job-protected educators good at swinging a hammer. The challenge is, today, we need fewer formalized hammers and more intuition-focused screwdrivers!

Resources for the Curious

This article draws upon principles from neuroscience, economics, and mathematics, applied through the lens of personal finance. For readers interested in exploring the original sources of these concepts, we recommend the following works and resources:

• Hulett, Jeff. "Wealth, Risk, and Time: The Hidden Power of Math in Smart Investing." Personal Finance Reimagined, Feb 2, 2025. (Connects mathematical intuition to achieving long-term financial success and managing risk.)

• Hulett, Jeff. "Case Study: Quantifying the Impact of Process-Driven Risk Education on Investment Behavior." Personal Finance Reimagined, 8 Apr. 2024.

• Buonomano, Dean. Your Brain Is a Time Machine: The Neuroscience and Physics of Time. W. W. Norton & Company, 2017. (Explores the brain's construction of time, relevant to perceiving the long-term nature of compound growth.)

• Bessis, David. Mathematica: A World of Discovery. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2023. (Defines mathematics as a language for communicating abstract ideas and imagination.)

• Dyson, George. Darwin Among the Machines: The Evolution of Global Intelligence. Basic Books, 1997. (Discusses the concept of sharing complex, four-dimensional structures through mediums like music.)

• Hofstadter, Douglas R. Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. Basic Books, 1999. (Illustrates the difficulty in shifting between the analytical components and the holistic perception of complex structures like music.)

• Led Zeppelin. "Stairway to Heaven." Led Zeppelin IV, 1971. (A core musical example used to illustrate the shift from holistic listening to analytical "seeing" of rhythmic and melodic structure.)

• Picasso, Pablo. General Work on Cubism/Geometric Abstraction. (Source for the theme of geometric abstraction and transforming the visible world into new, ordered forms.)

• Einstein, Albert. General Work on Special and General Relativity. (Source for the concept of the relativity of time and its mathematical description.)

• Jensen, Johan. General Work on Jensen's Inequality. (Source for the mathematical principle of convexity, specifically concerning the relationship between the expected value of a convex function and the function of the expected value, crucial for understanding compounding.)

• Nitecki, Zbigniew. Calculus Deconstructed: A Second Course in First-Year Calculus. MAA Press, 2007. (Provides the formal basis for understanding non-linear functions and the concept that a function's second derivative determines whether the rate of increase itself is increasing.)

• Khan, S. The one world schoolhouse: Education reimagined. Twelve, 2012. (The "flipping the classroom" model popularized by Khan emphasizes student-paced learning.)

• The Financial Literacy and Education Commission (FLEC). National Strategy for Financial Literacy 2020: Report to the U.S. Congress, Financial Foundations for Lifelong Learning. U.S. Department of the Treasury, 2020.